Appeal No. 1998-2334
Application No. 08/348,385
contention that their “method [i.e., the method defined by
appealed independent claim 1] does not react an intermediate
with CH I.”
3
It follows that we will sustain the examiner’s section
102 rejection of claims 1-28 as being anticipated by Wu.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007