Ex parte WINNER et al. - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                         
              written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                          
                                                                                     Paper No. 15                        

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                     __________                                                          
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                     __________                                                          
                                             Ex parte JAMES E. WINNER                                                    
                                               and JOHN RUTKOWSKI                                                        
                                                     __________                                                          
                                                Appeal No. 1998-2375                                                     
                                                Application 08/512,065                                                   
                                                     __________                                                          
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                     __________                                                          
              Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
              THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's final rejection of claims                 
              1 through 13, 15 and 17 through 58, which constitute all the claims remaining in the                       
              application.                                                                                               







                                                           1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007