Ex parte NELSON - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                            Paper No. 15              
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                               Ex parte ROBERT J. NELSON                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-2397                                 
                              Application No. 08/654,708                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before RUGGIERO, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 8 and 10 through 25.  In an                   
          Amendment After Final, filed on May 14, 1997, appellant                     
          cancelled claims 1 through 7 and amended claim 19.  In the                  
          Examiner's Answer (page 2), the examiner indicates that claims              
          20 through 23 are allowable and claim 19 is objected to as                  
          being dependent upon a rejected base claim.  Accordingly,                   







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007