Appeal No. 1998-2409 Application 08/398,259 reasonably appears to be met by Moroishi’s teaching that Ca, Mg, etc. can be present in the melt such that they combine with sulfur to eliminate the adverse effects of free sulfur (col. 3, lines 48-58; col. 6, lines 47-51). The requirement in claim 4 that a scavenger element is reacted with free sulfur to reduce the free sulfur content to 1 ppm, the requirement in claim 5 that the scavenger is yttrium, hafnium or zirconium, and the requirement in claim 6 that the substrate is processed to reduce the free sulfur content to less than about 1 ppm, would have been fairly suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art by Moroishi’s teaching that Ca, Mg, rare earth or Y can be added to form stable sulfur compounds from free sulfur, thereby eliminating the undesirable effects of free sulfur (col. 3, lines 16-66; col. 6, lines 47-55). For the above reasons we conclude, based upon the preponderance of the evidence, that the invention recited in appellants’ claims 1, 3-6, 14 and 16 would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, we affirm the rejection over Moroishi in view of McGill of these claims and claims 9-13, 15, 18 and 20 which each stand or fall with one of independent claims 1, 14 and 16 (brief, page 10). -8-8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007