Appeal No. 1998-2465 Application No. 08/599,192 fluoropolymers are poor transmitters for visible light, references evidencing that fluoropolymers are known to transmit infrared light better than visible light would have been appropriate. However, no such evidence was supplied by the examiner. In addition, our reviewing court requires the PTO to make specific findings on a suggestion to combine prior art references. In re Dembiczak, 175 F.3d 994, 1000-01, 50 USPQ2d 1614, 1617-19 (Fed. Cir. 1999). In the case before us, nowhere does the examiner particularly identify any suggestion, teaching, or motivation to combine the infrared light source with Tregay's probe, nor does the examiner make any specific factual findings that might serve to support a proper obviousness analysis. The examiner merely asserts that all optical devices have problems with ambient light noise, but has failed to support his assertion with references indicating that ambient visible light has any effect in the specific environment of an enclosed petroleum tank, nor that infrared light solves such a problem. Thus, the examiner has failed to set forth a prima facie case of obviousness. Accordingly, we cannot sustain the 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007