The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEROME SWARTZ, HOWARD M. SHEPARD,
ERIC F. BARKAN, MARK J. KRICHEVER,
BORIS METLITSKY, EDWARD BARKAN,
and ALEXANDER M. ADELSON
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2467
Application No. 08/353,682
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, JERRY SMITH, and LEVY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 41-43, 45-46, 48-51,1
and 53, which are all of the claims pending in this
application.
1An amendment filed subsequent to the final rejection (Paper No. 21,
filed January 24, 1997) has been entered by the examiner (Paper No. 22, mailed
August 5, 1997).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007