Appeal No. 1998-2476
Application No. 08/074,485
McClure. Therefore, we do not sustain the obviousness
rejection of these claims over Toupin, McClure, and Pohl.
In conclusion, we have reversed the examiner’s decision
rejecting claims 114, 119-130, 153, 178, 203, and 228 under 35
U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph; claims 114-117 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102 as being anticipated by Toupin; claims 115-144, 149-169,
174-194, 199-219, and 224-230 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
obvious over Toupin and McClure; claim 118 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 over Smith and Gerry; claims 145, 147, 170, 172, 195, 197,
220, and 222 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Toupin, McClure, and
Takano; and claims 146, 148, 171, 173, 196, 198, 221, and 223
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Toupin, McClure, and Pohl.
REVERSED
Michael R. Fleming )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Parshotam S. Lall ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Lance Leonard Barry )
14
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007