Ex parte KIM - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1998-2497                                                        
          Application No. 08/472,275                                                  


          never cites any specific claim language in explaining how                   
          Kahlman is being applied together with “Official Notice.”                   
               Clearly, the examiner has utterly failed to present a                  
          prima facie case of obviousness of the instant claimed subject              
          matter and we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-11                 
          and 15-31 under 35 U.S.C. 103.                                              



















               The examiner’s decision is reversed.                                   


                                      REVERSED                                        


                                         8–                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007