The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in
a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SHINJI YANO,
TAKASHI KOMORI,
SHINJI ISHIKAWA,
KATSUMI KITA, and
TAKASHI MIZOOU
__________
Appeal No. 1998-2543
Application 08/606,838
__________
HEARD: April 3, 2001
__________
Before WINTERS, SCHEINER, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 3, 6 through 8,
and 12 through 24. Claims 9 through 11, which are the only other claims remaining in the
application, stand withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as directed to a
non-elected invention.
The invention relates to phosphoric triesters having the formula (I):
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007