The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 46
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SEUNG-HUN OH
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2552
Application No. 08/292,977
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before OWENS, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 18 through 20, 31, 33, 35
and 36 as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the
amendment dated Nov. 6, 1997, Paper No. 36, entered as per the
Advisory Action dated Nov. 26, 1997, Paper No. 37).
According to appellant, the invention is directed to a
method of producing an optical fiber secondary preform by
collapsing an over-cladding tube on an optical fiber primary
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007