Ex parte WOOD - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-2570                                                        
          Application No. 08/381,156                                                  


          15. A method of displaying a sequence of frames of video                    
          information on a digital micromirror device having an array of              
          micromirrors that are disposed in rows and that are movable                 
          between a first position and a second position, the video                   
          information for a frame including a plurality of first multi-               
          bit video words, each micromirror corresponding to one of the               
          first multi-bit video words, each of the first multi-bit video              
          words including at least a most significant bit and a least                 
          significant bit, comprising:                                                
               (a) moving micromirrors which correspond to first video                
          words whose least significant bit has a predetermined value                 
          from their first positions to their second positions, the                   
          micromirrors of a first one of the rows being moved before the              
          micromirrors of a last one of the rows;                                     
               (b) returning the micromirrors that were moved during                  
          step (a) to their first positions, the micromirrors of the                  
          first row being returned before the morcromirrors of the last               
          row; and                                                                    
               (c) steadily exposing the micromirrors to light at a                   
          first level while step (a) is conducted and while step (b) is               
          conducted.                                                                  
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Nathanson et al. (Nathanson)       3,896,338                Jul.            
                                                                      22,             
                                                                      1975            
          Schell                        5,210,653                May  11,             
                                                                 1993                 
          Sampsell                      5,452,024                Sep. 19,             
                                                                 1995                 
                                                  (filed Nov. 01, 1993)               
               Claims 13 and 14 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Nathanson in view of Schell.               
          Claims 15-17 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)                

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007