THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte JAE KYEONG NOH
__________________
Appeal No. 1998-2576
Application 08/413,944
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and SMITH, JERRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
rejection of claims 1-11, which constitute all the claims in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to a method and apparatus for controlling a movie
camera shutter speed. More particularly, the invention uses a microcomputer for
determining a limited usable range of shutter speed when the camera is operating in a
manual shutter speed mode.
Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007