Ex parte PALMER et al. - Page 14




          Appeal No. 1998-2585                                                        
          Application No. 08/643,935                                                  


          rejection of claims 21 and 40 over Ooyama, Picault and                      
          Fuchigami.                                                                  
               In summary, we have sustained the obviousness rejection                
          with respect to claims 15, 16, 18, 19, 21 to 23, 25 to 28, 34,              
          35, 37, 38 and 40, but have reversed with respect to claims 1,              
          2, 4 to 6, and 8 to 12.                                                     


























                                         14                                           





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007