Appeal No. 1998-2603
Application 08/483,641
the Examiner’s rejection of claim 13, and likewise claims 14
and 15 which stand or fall therewith and contain the same
unmet limitation.
With respect to claims 16 and 17, we will not
sustain the Examiner’s rejection of these claims which also
include the unmet limitation of selection of a pattern from a
plurality of patterns.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the
Examiner rejecting claims 1, 3 through 5, 7 through 9, 11 and
12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed; however, the decision of
the Examiner rejecting claims 13 through 17 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 is reversed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007