Appeal No. 1998-2642 Application No. 08/697,339 and thus does not remedy the deficiencies of Staniforth. For the foregoing reasons, we determine that the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness. Accordingly, the rejection of the claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Staniforth in view of Burgess is reversed. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED ) CHARLES F. WARREN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT THOMAS A. WALTZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) JEFFREY T. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) TAW:hh KIRK M. HARTUNG ZARLEY, McKEE, THOMTE, VOORHEES & SEASE 801 GRAND AVE., SUITE 3200 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007