Appeal No. 1998-2692
Application 08/512,239
using said communications link from said remote controller to
said user apparatus using said transmitting means at said low
output power level.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Lambropoulos et al. 4,881,148 Nov. 14, 1989
(Lambropoulos)
Shiota 5,572,194 Nov. 05, 1996
(filed Sep. 02,
1994)
Boyles et al. (Boyles) 5,602,535 Feb. 11, 1997
(filed July 15,
1994)
Claims 3, 8-11 and 15-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103. As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers
Lambropoulos in view of Boyles with respect to claims 3, 8,
10, 11 and 16-21, and the examiner adds Shiota with respect to
claims 9 and 15.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007