Appeal No. 1998-2729
Application 08/220,851
three cycles. Quite obviously, a silent period would be
necessary in each cycle to distinguish one ring (i.e., cycle)
from the next. Although the Examiner’s conclusions regarding
sinusoidal waves may be accurate, sinusoidal waves are not
pertinent to Appellants’ context. In fact, the Examiner’s
sinusoidal and triangular wave examples are not mentioned nor
are they relevant to Appellants’ disclosure.
Accordingly, we find that the specification does support
the claim language, and meets the written description
requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112. Consequently, we will not
sustain the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,
rejection.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007