Appeal No. 1998-2742 Application No. 08/751,068 DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claim 16 as amended subsequent to the final rejection in a paper filed March 26, 1998 (Paper No. 10). Claims 18 through 36, which are all of the other claims remaining in the application, stand allowed. Claims 1 through 14, 15 and 17 have been canceled. Appellants’ invention, seen best in Figures 27 through 29 of the application, relates to an expansion joint for part of a railway track, particularly in the vicinity of a bridge where relative movement between a first fixed rail section (212) and a second movable rail section (210) can occur. As noted on page 19 of the specification, the first fixed rail section (212) is in the form of a pointed tongue, while the second movable rail section (210) is a stock rail. Claim 16 reads as follows: 16. An expansion joint for part of a railway track disposed on a foundation comprising: a first fixed rail section; a second rail section movable in relation to said first fixed rail section, said second rail section 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007