Appeal No. 1998-2761
Application No. 08/586,587
Claims 11 and 9 also contain at least the same limitation
as claim 1. Therefore, we do not sustain the obviousness
rejection of claims 11 and 9 for the same rationale.
In conclusion, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims
1, 9 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
PARSHOTAM S. LALL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
PSL:hh
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007