Appeal No. 1998-2800 Page 6 Application No. 08/572,505 explaining where the applied prior art suggests to one of ordinary skill in the art a modification of the method of Uesugi. In this regard, Uesugi is concerned with forming an aluminum lithographic printing plate support, the admitted prior art describes a batch process technique for treating copper and copper alloy plates to form a lead-frame and Fujikawa is directed to improving a photo- sensitive polyamide printing plate as outlined above. The examiner simply has not furnished a convincing line of reasoning or otherwise explained why the applied combined teachings of the references would have led one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the process of forming an aluminum lithographic printing plate support as taught by Uesugi based on the specific teachings of those references. It is significant that the examiner has not fairly addressed appellants' argument that one of ordinary skill in the art would not have been led to use a material such as the copper or copper alloy of the admitted prior art process in the lithographic printing plate support of Uesugi given the alleged differences between the semiconductor pellet fixing lead-frame material that was being addressed by the admittedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007