Ex parte DEFRANK et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1998-2823                                                        
          Application No. 08/458,010                                                  


          lack antecedent basis because only electromagnetic or infrared              
          energy                                                                      




          is described in the original disclosure, we agree with                      
          appellants’ argument (main brief, pp. 16-17) that the original              
          disclosure of electromagnetic energy (see, e.g., original                   
          claim 1) and infrared energy (see, e.g., original claim 10)                 
          provides descriptive support for the noted terminology.                     
               As to the terminology “first position,” appellants argue               
          that the term is used to define a location to which                         
          electromagnetic energy is communicated.  As explained at page               
          3 of the reply brief:                                                       
               [s]upport for Appellants’ use of the term “first                       
               position” is thus found in the specification as                        
               originally filed on page 3, lines 25-27, where                         
               Appellants, describing Figure 2, state that “the                       
               waveguide is generally cylindrical in shape and                        
               extends axially through the heat sink 20 for                           
               communication of infrared energy from the                              
               temperature source to the infrared detector.”  This                    
               clearly indicates that infrared energy is being                        
               communicated from a temperature source, such as a                      
               patient, to another location, which Appellants have                    
               identified in the claims as a “first position.”                        
          We agree with appellants that the terminology “first position”              

                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007