Appeal No. 1998-2841
Application No. 08/463,282
of description of those things not detailed in the specification would prevent the artisan
from making and using the invention claimed.
Upon weighing the factual considerations before us, we do not agree that the
instant disclosure fails to teach the artisan how to make and use the claimed invention. At
least for the reason that the rejection fails to consider the evidence as a whole, we do not
sustain the rejection of claims 1-3 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1-3 is reversed.
-9-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007