Appeal No. 1998-2876 Application No. 08/592,930 or scientific reasoning and thus cannot be regarded as reasonable. See Ex parte Skinner, 2 USPQ2d 1788, 1789 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1986). This deficiency is fatal to each of the prior art rejections advanced by the examiner on this appeal. As a consequence, we also will not sustain the section 102(e) rejection based on Tsumura, the section 103 rejection based on Tsumura in view of Masi or the section 102(b) rejection based on Kishimoto. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED Bradley R. Garris ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) Chung K. Pak ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) Howard B. Blankenship ) 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007