Appeal No. 1998-2895
Application No. 08/430,173
teaching that “information from all three of these memories
can be simultaneously retrieved and displayed,” we find that
the skilled artisan would have known from the teachings of the
references to simultaneously view the three sources of
information. As stated by the examiner (answer, page 5),
“Figures 5a, 5b, 13, and 14 in Nakamura all show simultaneous
display of different types of images” as claimed.
In summary, the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claim 23 is
sustained. The 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 10 through
12 and 19 is likewise sustained because we agree with the
examiner (answer, pages 4 and 6) that the skilled artisan
would have known from the teachings of the applied references
to simultaneously display the three different types of images
on a hi-vision monitor for greater resolution of the displayed
images.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 10 through
12, 19 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007