Ex parte CHAPPELL et al. - Page 2




            Appeal No. 1998-2982                                                                              
            Application No. 08/582,716                                                                        

                                               BACKGROUND                                                     
                   The invention is directed to an incrementer circuit.   Claim 1 is reproduced below.        
                   1.    An incrementing circuit comprising:                                                  
                         an input latch for receiving a pulsed input data and outputting a static             
                   complement of the pulsed input data, the pulsed input data representing a number           
                   to be incremented;                                                                         
                         a carry-lookahead circuit, coupled to receive said static complement of the          
                   pulsed input data, said carry-lookahead circuit for generating a carry signal from the     
                   number to be incremented; and                                                              
                         a summing circuit coupled to receive the carry signals from the carry-               
                   lookahead circuit and the pulsed input data representing the number to be                  
                   incremented, said summing circuit for summing said carry signals and said pulsed           
                   input data and producing a pulsed output representing a sum.                               
                   The examiner relies on the following references:                                           
            Renfro et al.  (Renfro)                5,345,110                 Sep.  6, 1994                    
            Jagini                                 5,384,724                 Jan. 24, 1995                    
                   Claims 1-7, 10, and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                       
            unpatentable over Jagini and Renfro.                                                              
                   We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 7) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper             
            No. 12) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No. 11) and the        
            Reply Brief (Paper No. 13) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand        
            rejected.                                                                                         





                                                     -2-                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007