Appeal No. 1998-3049
Application No. 08/463,558
Dahllof, “Medium Consistency Ozone Bleaching,” Kvaerner, Karlstd,
Sweden (unknown publication date).
REJECTION
The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:
1) Claims 18 through 23, 25 through 30 and 32 through 41 under 35
U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as lacking written descriptive
support for the subject matter presently claimed
2) Claims 18 through 21, 23, 25 through 28, 30 and 32 through 41
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures
of Sundman, Phillips and either Soteland or the admitted prior art;
3) Claims 18 through 21, 23, 25 through 28, 30 and 32 through 41
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures
of Meredith, Sundman, Phillips, and either Soteland or the admitted
prior art;
4) Claims 22 and 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
the combined disclosures of Meredith, Sundman, Phillips, either
Soteland or the admitted prior art and either Kimura or Coste; and
5) Claims 18 through 23, 25 through 30 and 32 through 41 under
the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double
patenting as unpatentable over claims 18 through 35 of copending
Application 08/462,691.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007