Appeal No. 1998-3061 Application No. 08/638,903 Claims 1-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as unpatentable over Brock in view of Chien. Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of appellant and the examiner. OPINION The examiner combines Brock, dealing with a sight alignment for a chain saw, with Chien, dealing with a laser sight for a camera to help in a focusing function. We agree with appellant that these two references deal with nonanalogous arts and are, therefore, not properly combinable. Chien, dealing with the camera arts, is clearly not within appellant’s endeavor pertaining to cut measurement devices for chain saws. Moreover, Chien is not even pertinent to the problem with which appellant is concerned since a laser used for focusing purposes in the camera arts has no clear -3-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007