Appeal No. 1998-3078 Page 7
Application No. 08/365,617
Because there is no evidence that the Hayden's seam-free
substrate would have been desirable in Dhong's DRAM cell, we
are not persuaded that teachings from the prior art would have
suggested the combination. Therefore, we reverse the
rejection of claims 1-15, 24, and 26-28 as obvious over Dhong
in view of Hayden.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1-15, 24, and 26-28
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Dhong in
view of Hayden is reversed.
REVERSED
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007