The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HERBERT FISCHER, WINFRIED EMMERLING,
THOMAS MOELLER, HERMANN ONUSSEIT, WERNER HALLER,
BERNHARD SCHOETTMER, BERNHARD HERLFTERKAMP,
DIETER FEUSTEL, KLAUS FRIEDRICH,
HARTMUT BUESCHING and NORBERT HUEBNER
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-3118
Application No. 08/ 448,543
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ and JEFFREY SMITH , Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 13-25, 27, 30, 31, 33-38, 40-
44, 50, 51, 65-73 and 75-78. These are all of the claims remaining in the application.
The subject matter on appeal relates to a composition, and to various methods of
using the composition, comprising a nonionic polyurethane consisting essentially of
specified groups including residues of tetramethylxylene diisocyanate. This appealed
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007