Appeal No. 1998-3131 Page 11
Application No. 08/192,224
or other desired on-board (on-preform) component in a high
density planar packing arrangement." Id. at
ll. 44-48. The examiner fails to allege, let alone show, that
the addition of Barbero or Hoisington cures the deficiency of
Chan.
Because Chan teaches no alignment features, we are not
persuaded that teachings from the applied prior art would
appear to have suggested the claimed limitations of "a print
head mounted within the recess and shaped to define at least
one ink passageway along a substantial length of the print
head and wherein the recess has long side edges and the body
is shaped to define alignment features for aligning the print
head in the recess spaced from the long side edges of the
recess ...." The examiner fails to establish a prima facie
case of obviousness. Therefore, we reverse the rejection of
claim 15 as obvious over Chan in view of Barbero further in
view of Hoisington.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007