Ex parte NARABU et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1998-3135                                      Page 10           
          Application No. 08/789,519                                                  


               (in FIGURE 6).                                                         
                    Therefore the conversion factor 0H, i.e., the                     
               signal amplitude obtained at the time of input of                      
               one electron to the FD region 1 (in FIGURE 5) and 11                   
               (in FIGURE 6), is given by                                             
                    0H = V/N = e-/C        .... (2)                                   
               We find from equation 1 (V = Q/C = Ne-/C) that the signal              
          amplitude V is directly related to the capacitance of the                   
          electric charge converter.  In addition, it is clear from                   
          equation 2 (0H = V/N = e-/C) that the conversion factor 0H is               
          directly related to the signal amplitude V.  In view of                     
          Kadota’s addition of a second gate and second diffusion                     
          region, and the changing the voltage of the floating diffusion              
          region 2, we find that in Kadota, the charge-to-voltage                     
          conversion factor is selectively changed by resetting the                   
          diffusion layer to a high voltage.  Thus, we conclude that                  
          Kadota meets the recited claim language of the conversion                   
          factor being selectively changed in response to gate voltages               
          selectively applied to said first and second precharge gate                 
          electrodes.  Accordingly, we will affirm the rejection of                   
          claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                              
               Turning next to the rejection of claim 6 under 35 U.S.C.               










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007