Appeal No. 1998-3205 Application No. 08/272,438 Furthermore, with regard to the § 103 aspect of the rejection, the examiner has not explained how a person of ordinary skill would have been led from “here to there,” i.e., from the composition of Bors to the “coalescent-free” coating composition of appellants comprising “an aqueous emulsion-polymerized polymeric binder having a glass transition temperature from about -35ēC to about +25ēC.” Therefore, the examiner has failed to establish that Bors constitutes sufficient evidence to support a conclusion of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. In fact, based on our review of the Bors patent in its entirety, we find that Bors teaches away from a “coalescent-free” coating composition as that term is defined in appellants’ specification, page 4, third full paragraph. Bors states that “useful emulsion polymers will generally have Tg s under 60ēC, since these polymers, with sufficient coalescent, will form good quality films at ambient temperatures” (col. 5, lines 59-62). The working examples of Bors disclose coating compositions having relatively high amounts of coalescent. Likewise, the examiner has not established that Smith describes or suggests appellants’ “coalescent-free” coating composition comprising “an 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007