Ex Parte CECCHIN et al - Page 3


               Appeal No. 1998-3209                                                                                                   
               Application 08/338,284                                                                                                 

               Brown, 459 F.2d 531, 535, 173 USPQ 685, 688 (CCPA 1972), along with the physical properties                            
               which the claimed homo- and copolymers so produced are specified to possess.  We interpret the                         
               plain, generic language of the process limitations to permit the use of any process conditions in                      
               the sequential polymerization process as long as two stages are employed along with the                                
               specified catalyst.  Through the use of the open-ended term “comprising,” the catalyst is not                          
               limited to the stated catalyst, co-catalyst and silane components or any amounts thereof, but can                      
               contain other ingredients or components, including other polymerization catalysts, co-catalysts,                       
               internal electron donors and external electron donors, bearing in mind that the specified physical                     
               properties must be obtained.  See In re Baxter, 656 F.2d 679, 686-87, 210 USPQ 795, 802-03                             
               (CCPA 1981) (“As long as one of the monomers in the reaction is propylene, any other monomer                           
               may be present, because the term ‘comprises’ permits the inclusion of other steps, elements, or                        
               materials.”).  With respect to the specified physical properties, the ratio of weight average                          
               molecular weight to number average molecular weight, Mw/Mn, that is molecular weight                                   
               distribution, must be greater than 20, and the melt index value, MIL, must be greater than 2g/10                       
               minutes.                                                                                                               
                       We have carefully reviewed the teachings of Cohen and find that the reference would                            
               have disclosed to one of ordinary skill in this art the preparation of a crystalline propylene                         
               homopolymer or copolymer of propylene and another alpha-olefin by sequential polymerization                            
               using a catalyst system under polymerization conditions as taught in the reference (e.g., cols. 5-8                    
               and 10-13, and Example 14).  Indeed, Cohen clearly provides for the preparation of highly                              
               crystalline homopolymers and copolymers of propylene which have, inter alia, a molecular                               
               weight distribution of 6 to about 50 and “a useful melt flow rate of at least about 0.1 up to about                    
               200 grams per 10 minutes,” by sequential polymerization in at least two stages, wherein each of                        
               the stages can be conducted in batch in the same reactor and the conditions for polymerization                         
               include “the use of a molecular weight control agent or other techniques to control the molecular                      
               weights of the homopolymer or copolymer produced in each stage,” such as hydrogen (e.g., col.                          
               5, lines 29-55, col. 6, line 27, to col. 8, line 37, and col. 10, line 20, to col. 11, line 3).  The                   

                                                                                                                                      
               1  The examiner withdrew the grounds of rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, and                         
               35 U.S.C. § 102(e) over Cohen (answer, page 3).                                                                        

                                                                - 3 -                                                                 



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007