Ex Parte YASUI et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                            Paper No. 27              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                    Ex parte YOSHINARI YASUI and TAKASHI IWASAKI                      
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-3271                                  
                               Application 08/563,156                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before PAK, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                 
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of               
          claims 3-30 and 32, which are all of the claims remaining in the            
          application.                                                                
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim an apparatus for applying a liquid                
          coating to a surface of a traveling continuous web.  Claims 3               
          and 5 are illustrative and a copy of the claims is appended to              
          this decision.                                                              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007