Ex parte KENNEY - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-3316                                                        
          Application No. 08/203,300                                                  


          claims 1 and 4 through 9 constitute all of the claims before                
          us for review.                                                              


               Appellant's invention pertains to a print holder.  A                   
          basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a                  
          reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which appears in the                
          APPENDIX to the main brief (Paper No. 24).                                  


               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the               
          documents listed below:                                                     


          Lyman                    4,271,618                     Jun.  9,             
          1981                                                                        
          Pougher                  568,168                       Mar. 21,             
          1945                                                                        
          (Great Britain)                                                             

               The following rejection is before us for review.                       


               Claims 1 and 4 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Pougher in view of Lyman.                  



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007