Appeal No. 1998-3329 Page 10
Application No. 08/261,518
child computer, rather than from the parent computer.” (Spec.
at 4-5.) The examiner, moreover, does not challenge the
appellant’s explanation.
Because the examiner fails to show that Radia’s symbolic
links are linked to computers on which execution is to be
performed or to challenge the appellant’s explanation that
they are not so linked, we are not persuaded that the
teachings from the applied prior art would have suggested the
limitations of "(a) providing ... a local machine name which
is a symbolic link for specifying a computer on which
execution is to be performed; ... (b) if the process is to be
locally executed on the first computer, linking the local
machine name to the first computer, and controlling the first
computer to execute the process; and ... (c) if the process is
to be remotely executed on the second computer, transferring
the first context from the first computer to the second
computer, adding the second context to the first context,
linking the local machine name to the second computer, and
controlling the second computer to execute the process" or “a
local machine name which is a symbolic link for specifying a
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007