The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BERNARD C. NELSON and CARLOS M. LUGTU ____________ Appeal No. 1998-3342 Application No. 08/540,943 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 1-6. We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal tracks records. Businesses expend financial and personnel resources to find and manage records. In a hospital, for example, patients who are critically ill can best be treated when their physiciansPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007