Appeal No. 1998-3355
Application No. 08/665,167
14-18. The examiner has not addressed the obviousness of claim 1 as to Eaton alone
therefore, we will include dependent claims 4, 5, and 10 with the grouping of claim 1, and
we will not sustain the rejection of claims 4, 5, and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-18 under 35 U.S.C.
§§ 102 and 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
jld/vsh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007