Ex parte STROHACKER - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-3362                                                        
          Application No. 08/516,773                                                  


               means for forming the serially read video data into                    
          groups;                                                                     
               means for transmitting formed groups in ordered                        
          succession;                                                                 
               means for compressing the video data as represented in                 
          the ordered succession of groups; and                                       
               means for transmitting tokens representing the ordered                 
          succession of groups in compressed form.                                    

               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Hattori                       5,170,368                Dec. 08,             
                                                                 1992                 
          Katayama et al. (Katayama)    5,361,147                Nov. 01,             
                                                                 1994                 
          Strohacker                    5,526,472                Jun. 11,             
                                                                 1996                 
                                                  (filed Oct. 07, 1994)               
               Claims 1-4, 6, 15-18, and 20 stand finally rejected under              
          35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner                  
          offers Katayama alone with respect to claims 1, 2, 15, and 16,              
          and adds Hattori to Katayama with respect to claims 3, 4, 6,                
          17, 18, and 20.  In a separate 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection,                   
          claims 3, 4, 6, 17, 18, and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Katayama in view of                        
          Strohacker.                                                                 



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007