Appeal No. 1998-3362 Application No. 08/516,773 means for forming the serially read video data into groups; means for transmitting formed groups in ordered succession; means for compressing the video data as represented in the ordered succession of groups; and means for transmitting tokens representing the ordered succession of groups in compressed form. The Examiner relies on the following prior art: Hattori 5,170,368 Dec. 08, 1992 Katayama et al. (Katayama) 5,361,147 Nov. 01, 1994 Strohacker 5,526,472 Jun. 11, 1996 (filed Oct. 07, 1994) Claims 1-4, 6, 15-18, and 20 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner offers Katayama alone with respect to claims 1, 2, 15, and 16, and adds Hattori to Katayama with respect to claims 3, 4, 6, 17, 18, and 20. In a separate 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection, claims 3, 4, 6, 17, 18, and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Katayama in view of Strohacker. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007