Appeal No. 1999-0063
Application No. 08/602,366
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs and Answer for the2
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the Examiner, the arguments
in support of the rejections and the evidence of obviousness
relied upon by the Examiner as support for the obviousness
rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
consideration, in reaching our decision, Appellant’s arguments
set forth in the Briefs along with the Examiner’s rationale in
support of the rejections and arguments in rebuttal set forth
in the Examiner’s Answer.
It is our view, after consideration of the record before
us, that Appellant’s specification in this application
describes the claimed invention in a manner which complies
2The Appeal Brief (Paper No. 13) was filed December 1, 1997. In
response to the Examiner’s Answer (Paper No. 14) dated February 10, 1998, a
Reply Brief (Paper No. 16) was filed April 9, 1998, which was acknowledged and
entered by the Examiner without further comment in the communication (Paper
No. 18) dated July 8, 1998.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007