Ex parte MATSUYAMA - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1999-0081                                                        
          Application No. 08/506,645                                                  


          basis for the view that the use of the word “range” is that                 
          the respective key actuation of the claimed switch enlarges or              
          reduces the range of a region.  Appellant’s position at pages               
          3 and 4 of the reply brief is such that when viewed in light                
          of the specification’s disclosure, the word “range” is                      
          essentially defined in the specification to mean an                         
          enlargement or reduction of the size or range of a region of                
          the video signal.                                                           
               Our study of the specification as filed as a whole is                  
          consistent with this view.  Beginning with the discussion of                
          the                                                                         





          prior art at page 1 of the specification as filed, it is noted              
          at the bottom of that page that it was known in the art to                  
          utilize an operating lever to enter coordinate or X, Y                      
          position information “and to set the input picture size or                  
          range using an operating button, such as a so-called volume                 
          knob”.  The setting action “altered” the size or range of the               
          input picture.  In this light, the word “range” appears to be               
                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007