The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MINORU INABA ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0112 Application No. 08/693,614 ____________ HEARD: March 7, 2001 ____________ Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, FRANKFORT, and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judges. LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 5 through 9, which are all of the claims pending in this application.1 We reverse and add a new ground of rejection. 1 Claims 1 through 4 have been canceled pursuant to applicant's amendment filed September 8, 1997 (Paper No. 10).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007