Ex parte VAN HALL et al. - Page 1




                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                                       
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                           

                 Paper No. 22                                                                                                                           

                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                     Ex parte MAURICE VAN HALL, DAVID I. MIDDLETON, HENRI SCHWEGMAN,                                                                    
                                               JAMES L. McMILLAN, and IAN BARRETT                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1999-0178                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/658,849                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                     ON BRIEF 1                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before COHEN, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                            
                 COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                    



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         


                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                                                                        
                 through 10. These claims constitute all of the claims in the                                                                           
                 application.                                                                                                                           




                          1The hearing set for March 6, 2000 was waived by                                                                              
                 appellants (Paper No. 21).                                                                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007