Ex parte HERT et al. - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                               Paper No. 23           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      

                       Ex parte MARIUS HERT and PATRICE PERRET                        
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1999-0268                                  
                             Application No. 08/650,608                               
                                    ____________                                      
                               HEARD: October 24, 2001                                
                                    ____________                                      

          Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and OWENS, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of               
          claims 1, 8 and 13, which are all of the claims remaining in                
          the application.                                                            
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward an                
          article of manufacture comprising a specified thermoplastic                 
          composition.  Claim 13 is illustrative:                                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007