The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAUL M. URBANUS and ROBERT J. GOVE
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-0301
Application No. 08/156,541
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, BARRETT and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 15 and 19-25. Claim 1 stands
allowed.
The invention pertains to digital pulse-width modulated display systems. Claim 15
is illustrative and reads as follows:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007