The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte CRAIG A. NELSON, HARINARAYANA ARIMILLI, and RICHARD D. JOHNSON _____________ Appeal No. 1999-0353 Application No. 08/368,291 _____________ HEARD: December 4, 2000 _____________ Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 6-9. The examiner has withdrawn rejections against claims 1-5 and those claims have now been indicated as allowable. The invention is directed to a modem with a firmware upgrade feature. More particularly, a remote source initiates and conducts software modifications relative to a modem but the software is not overwritten until the entire change or upgrade code is received without loss or error. This ensures that the upgrade in the modem will be madePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007