The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte
_____________
Appeal No.
Application No.
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, and, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
On Request for Re-hearing
Appellants request re-hearing of our decision of March
13, 2001, in which we affirmed the rejection of claims 7-11,
14-17 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. ~ 102 as being anticipated by
the admitted prior art and affirmed the rejection of claims
14, 18 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. ~ 103 as being unpatentable
over the admitted prior art.
Appellantŝ request fails to show any points raised by
them on appeal which were misapprehended or overlooked by
the board in rendering its decision.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007