Ex parte MORIZANE - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-0461                                                        
          Application No. 08/815,682                                                  



               4.  A method for producing metal oxide                                 
               micro-spherules, which comprises: subjecting a                         
               hydrolyzable organic metal compound to hydrolysis in                   
               a reaction solution consisting of water, an organic                    
               solvent, halogen ions as a catalyst and boron ions,                    
               while maintaining pH value of said reaction solution                   
               in a range of from 8  to 10, followed by dehydration                   
               and condensation to obtain micro-spherules;                            
               thereafter rinsing said micro-spherules with water                     
               for separation of said micro-spherules from the                        
               reaction solution; and maintaining said                                
               micro-spherules at a temperature of 200ēC or below.                    
                        REFERENCE RELIED UPON BY THE EXAMINER                         
          Kondo et al. (Kondo)           5,160,358           Nov. 03,                 
          1992                                                                        
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 4-6 stand rejected as follows: under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 101, as being inoperable, and under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                      
          enablement and written description requirements.                            
                                       OPINION                                        
               We reverse the aforementioned rejections.                              
                        Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and                          
                       35 U.S.C. § 112, enablement requirement                        
               Before utility, which is a question of fact, is                        
          determined, the claims must be interpreted as a matter of law               
          to define the invention to be tested for utility.  See                      

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007