The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte WILLIAM D. RHODEN and RAJEEV JAYAVANT __________ Appeal No. 1999-0466 Application 08/530,617 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-17, which constitute all the claims in the application. In response to appellants’ brief on appeal, the examiner has indicated that claims 3-17 are allowable over the prior art of record [answer, page 2]. Therefore, this appeal is now directed to 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007