Ex parte LABEDZ et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-0470                                                        
          Application 08/639,136                                                      


          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
          1. A method of controlling a code-division multiple                         
          access (CDMA) wireless communication system, the CDMA wireless              
          communication system including a mobile station responsive to               
          a plurality of base-stations, the method comprising the steps               
          of:                                                                         
          simulating parameters related to the CDMA wireless                          
          communication system in a simulator;                                        
          generating location information related to an analog                        
          wireless communication system which is a potential source of                
          interference to the CDMA wireless communication system based                
          on the simulation; and                                                      
          controlling certain aspects of the CDMA wireless                            
          communication system utilizing the data generated.                          
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Markus                     5,561,841            Oct. 1, 1996                
          (filed Sep. 15, 1994)                                                       
          Claims 1, 3, 6-20, 22 and 25-32 stand rejected under                        
          35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner                   
          offers Markus taken alone.                                                  
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for                 
          the respective details thereof.                                             
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the                      
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007